<< Click to Display Table of Contents >> Navigation:  Normative Assessment Report > The Normative Assessment Report Strength, Limitation, and Best Practice

The new normative assessment report provide a framework for understanding and interpreting an individual's test performance in comparison to the established norms. This framework includes information about the individual's strengths and weaknesses, as well as their overall level of functioning.

 

Strength:

 

* Provides valuable insights into potential personality tendencies and psychopathology by comparing individual performance to large norms across various Rorschach variables.

* Uncovers relationships between variables and established norms, offering a deeper understanding of the individual's personality.

* Converts Rorschach data (codes, composite variables, ratios, and constellations) into continuous variables for easier analysis.

* Generates interpretation hypotheses based on research and clinical evidence, aiding in assessment of personality and mental health.

 

Limitation:

 

* Interpretation hypotheses are prone to overgeneralization and might not perfectly reflect the individual.

* First version of the report, so bugs are expected and caution is advised.

* Norms are based primarily on clinical cases, potentially leading to under-pathologization.

* The selected variables and categories are limited in scope and may not capture all relevant information.

* Certain variables load onto multiple clusters, but are presented only in one to avoid redundancy.

 

Best Practice:

 

* Use the report, along with other clinical data, to formulate possible interpretations of the results, while considering alternative explanations and potential biases.

* Introduce these interpretations hypotheses within the clinical dialogue, observing the patient's response.

* Prioritize interpreting personality strengths to build rapport and empower the patient.

* Enable the patient to utilize their strengths to cope with and overcome areas of weakness.